Wednesday, July 9, 2008

Largest Tax Increase in History? "Marlarky," Says Boyda Camp

We've been hearing it for months- "The Democrat [sic] controlled Congress has passed the largest tax increase in history, blah blah blah..." We've all heard it, and, hopefully, everyone on both sides knows it's nothing more than partisan lies.

Even though it is just partisan lies, that certainly doesn't prevent both Jim Ryun and Lynn Jenkins for repeating it- often. There lack of integrity isn't new or so much surprising, but, still, holding their fee to the fire is the calling of this particular blog, so we're glad to again oblige.

Today, however, we have the help of the mainstream media.

Former Congressman Jim Ryun's campaign spokeswoman told Harris News Service on Monday that Boyda's first term as Kansas' 2nd District congresswoman included her vote for "the largest tax increase in American history."

But Boyda's spokesman, Thomas Seay, refers to a national nonpartisan organization's conclusion that the claim, oft-repeated by Republican candidates, simply isn't true.

"It's, frankly, malarkey," Seay said.
Why, oh wise Mr. Seay, is it malarkey? The article provides a narrative of how this persestent falsehood came into being.
The tax hike claim, first promoted by the National Republican Congressional Committee, surfaced in March after House Democrats, including Boyda, passed a budget resolution, a non-binding proposal to map out budgets for coming years.

Republicans opposed it and issued press releases decrying it as a $683 billion tax hike, or a $2,863 annual increase for the average Kansan.

The resolution laid out a plan to balance the federal budget by ending tax cuts put in place by the Bush administration in 2001 and 2003.
But, wait...so the Democrats do want to increase our taxes? Ah, but there is more:

However, Democrats say they want to change the law to extend the middle-class tax cuts indefinitely beyond 2010.

"Of course, the congresswoman strongly opposes allowing the middle-class Bush tax cuts to expire," Seay said. "She believes that marriage penalty tax relief, the 10 percent tax bracket, and the increased child tax credit should all be made permanent.
Ah ha. So, really, in the end, we're just talking about the Republicans trying to protect the tax cuts for their base- multimillionaires and billionaires.

But wait, Boyda has sympathy for those good folks, too.
"She's also willing to consider extending cuts for the super-wealthy if Congress can find a responsible way to pay for it."

That could occur if lawmakers opt to, say, cut billions in funds elsewhere, such as by scaling back subsidies to big oil companies and major health insurers, Seay said.

"That alone could save more than $70 billion tax dollars over the next five years."
So...there you go. Boyda doesn't support increasing taxes on average Americans, and she doesn't support increasing taxes on the vast, vast majority of Kansans. And she'll even consider keeping the cuts in place for the super-rich if we can eliminate tax breaks for, say, Big Oil.

But there is one final bit to all of this that the Republicans always conveniently ignore: The "largest tax increase in history" that the Democrats supposedly passed...never did. No budget, not one line of any bill, has contained any of the language the House approved in the above mentioned non-binding resolution. Nada. None of it.
"The truth is that Congress has yet to vote either way on extending the Bush tax cuts," he said. "The sunset clauses don't take effect until 2011, and Congress won't pass a 2011 budget for another two years."
So, is that the end? Can we finally put this mess behind us? Have we fully and completely discredited the Republicans by now?

We should only be so lucky.
However, Seay said he expected to continue to hear Republicans repeat the tax hike claim.

"They're going to keep on making it until Election Day."
Nothing more than a skipping record, those dang Republicans.

12 comments:

Anonymous said...

If you vote to eliminate tax breaks or allow the tax cuts for those in upper income brackets to expire .... you are indeed increasing taxes.

Largest in history .... I don't know ..... but large tax increase .. most definately

Anonymous said...

The numberof people affected isn't large- the percent of kansans effected is tiny tiny- and it is responsible tax policy. Middle class Americans deserve cuts...the super rich do not

Anonymous said...

malarkey? haha

Anonymous said...

malarky is a great word

Anonymous said...

I love of when people call out the republicans for their bullshit.

Anonymous said...

You can dismiss it as going to the rich but the truth is .... It is a large tax increase

Anonymous said...

and anyone cares about increasing taxes on the rich because....?

they can indeed pay their fair share- which is significantly more than they are paying now.

boyda's right on the money on this one, and it's impossible for the republicans to win if they're the party of "stick it to the little guy."

Anonymous said...

it is funny how some people will defend large tax increases as long as it is on someone else's back to carry

the redistribution of wealth crowd is alive and well in the Democratic Party

Anonymous said...

Ding Ding!!
"She believes that marriage penalty tax relief, the 10 percent tax bracket, and the increased child tax credit should all be made permanent."

How many people here are at of below the 10 percent tax bracket?

Last time I checked Middle Class Americans pay more than JUST the 10%! No relife for the middle class.

Anonymous said...

typo on my part "relief"

Anonymous said...

rich people didn't deserve the tax cut, and boyda's right in wanting it applied to the people that do deserve it.

Anonymous said...

[p]猫聛陆 At the same time id theft can really cause chaos using your ability to attain credit rating and see employment, this can possibly make a number of many other conflicts for your needs . It's [url=http://www.vivienneuksale.co.uk]vivienne westwood earrings[/url] a home grown classic with a proud heritage and a distinct provenance . However the retail industry relies [url=http://www.vivienneuksale.co.uk]vivienne westwood necklace[/url] heavily on part time casuals whose commitments lie elsewhere in studies or affording lifestyle . Academic dress in France In France, academic dress, also called the toge (from the word toga, an ancient Roman garment) is similar to French judges' court dress, except for its colour, which depends on the academic field in which the wearer graduated . It once designed and produced leather goods [url=http://www.vivienneuksale.co.uk]vivienne westwood sale[/url] for British top designer, Patrick Cox . D . Supply and Demand Mens Fashion Accessories

Economic downturn or not, the men's fashion accessories market is grossly under supplied and below par . This gown is worn as the undress gown for higher doctorates, with a Cambridge-type gown for full dress.[/p][p][url=http://www.viviennejewelry.co.uk/vivienne-westwood-necklaces.html]Buy Genuine Vivienne Westwood Necklaces[/url] viviennewestwoodmenswear . Product diversity and unique [url=http://www.viviennejewelry.co.uk]vivienne westwood bags[/url] ingenuity make salvatore ferragamo famous . As much as you want to please your partner, at times spending a lot of money is not that necessary . I have made a pledge to turn my will and my life over to the power of the House of [url=http://www.vivienneuksale.co.uk]vivienne westwood rings[/url] Gucci . Retrieved [url=http://www.viviennejewelry.co.uk]vivienne westwood london[/url] 2010-02-13 . Gucci Belt Wish to have similar linked to images in comparison to its all parties of your own handlebar . It is not arduous to seem [url=http://www.viviennejewelry.co.uk/vivienne-westwood-cufflinks.html]Vivienne Westwood Cufflinks Online Sale[/url] like an "It" girl . Trench Coat: Burberry Having modelled for newborn brand together with former beau George Craig and tiny bro Alex Watson, Emma is a basic real buff of the British history brand, aside from that has the collection along the lines of outerwear to agree it.[/p]

This blog is not affiliated in any way with the Kansas Democratic Party, the Democratic National Committee, Congresswoman Nancy Boyda, the Office of Congresswoman Nancy Boyda, or the campaign to re-elected Congresswoman Nancy Boyda. All commentary herein not directly attributed must be considered the opinion of the authors of this blog and not of any other individual, including Congresswoman Nancy Boyda.